FINA 210 Problems Solution Manual 9th Ed, Spring 2011
American University of Beirut · Business Finance · 28 pages · with solution
Showing the first 10 of 28 pages. Download the PDF to see all of it.
More FINA 210 files
- Problems Chap 7 · Spring 2015ProblemsView
- Problems Chap 8 · Spring 2015ProblemsView
- Problems · Spring 2011ProblemsView
- Homework Chap 6 · Spring 2015HomeworkView
- Lecture Capital Budgeting · Spring 2015LabView
- Homework Chap 6 · Fall 2013HomeworkView
- Homework Chap 5 · Fall 2013HomeworkView
- Homework Chap 3 · Fall 2013HomeworkView
Show the text of this problems
Solutions for HW chap 3. (9th ed)
1. Using the formula for NWC, we get:
NWC = CA – CL
CA = CL + NWC = $3,720 + 1,370 = $5,090
So, the current ratio is:
Current ratio = CA / CL = $5,090/$3,720 = 1.37 times
And the quick ratio is:
Quick ratio = (CA – Inventory) / CL = ($5,090 – 1,950) / $3,720 = 0.84 times
4. Inventory turnover = COGS / Inventory
Inventory turnover = $4,105,612 / $407,534 = 10.07 times
Days’ sales in inventory = 365 days / Inventory turnover = 365 / 10.07 = 36.23 days
On average, a unit of inventory sat on the shelf 36.23 days before it was sold.
5. Total debt ratio = 0.63 = TD / TA
Substituting total debt plus total equity for total assets, we get:
0.63 = TD / (TD + TE)
Solving this equation yields:
0.63(TE) = 0.37(TD)
Debt/equity ratio = TD / TE = 0.63 / 0.37 = 1.70
Equity multiplier = 1 + D/E = 2.70
12. The equity multiplier is:
EM = 1 + D/E
EM = 1 + 0.65 = 1.65
One formula to calculate return on equity is:
ROE = (ROA)(EM)
ROE = .085(1.65) = .1403 or 14.03%
ROE can also be calculated as:
ROE = NI / TE
So, net income is:
NI = ROE(TE)
NI = (.1403)($540,000) = $75,735.
19. This is a multi-step problem involving several ratios. It is often easier to look backward to
determine where to start. We need receivables turnover to find days’ sales in receivables. To calculate
receivables turnover, we need credit sales, and to find credit sales, we need total sales. Since we are
given the profit margin and net income, we can use these to calculate total sales as:
PM = 0.087 = NI / Sales = $218,000 / Sales; Sales = $2,505,747
Credit sales are 70 percent of total sales, so:
Credit sales = $2,515,747(0.70) = $1,754,023
Now we can find receivables turnover by:
Receivables turnover = Credit sales / Accounts receivable = $1,754,023 / $132,850 = 13.20 times
Days’ sales in receivables = 365 days / Receivables turnover = 365 / 13.20 = 27.65 days
24. The only ratio given which includes cost of goods sold is the inventory turnover ratio, so it is
the last ratio used. Since current liabilities is given, we start with the current ratio:
Current ratio = 1.40 = CA / CL = CA / $365,000
CA = $511,000
Using the quick ratio, we solve for inventory:
Quick ratio = 0.85 = (CA – Inventory) / CL = ($511,000 – Inventory) / $365,000
Inventory = CA – (Quick ratio × CL)
Inventory = $511,000 – (0.85 × $365,000)
Inventory = $200,750
Inventory turnover = 5.82 = COGS / Inventory = COGS / $200,750
COGS = $1,164,350
Solutions to HW chap 5( 9th ed )
1. The simple interest per year is:
$5,000 × .08 = $400
So after 10 years you will have:
$400 × 10 = $4,000 in interest.
The total balance will be $5,000 + 4,000 = $9,000
With compound interest we use the future value formula:
FV = PV(1 +r)t
FV = $5,000(1.08)10 = $10,794.62
The difference is:
$10,794.62 – 9,000 = $1,794.62
9. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same
answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for t, we get:
t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r)
t = ln ($170,000 / $40,000) / ln 1.053 = 28.02 years
13. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same
answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for r, we get:
r = (FV / PV)1 / t – 1
r = ($1,260,000 / $150)1/112 – 1 = .0840 or 8.40%
To find the FV of the first prize, we use:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
FV = $1,260,000(1.0840)33 = $18,056,409.94
20. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same
answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
Solving for t, we get:
t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r)
t = ln($75,000 / $10,000) / ln(1.11) = 19.31
So, the money must be invested for 19.31 years. However, you will not receive the money for
another two years. From now, you’ll wait:
2 years + 19.31 years = 21.31 years
Selected solutions to HW chap 6
30. Here we need to convert an EAR into interest rates for different compounding periods. Using
the equation for the EAR, we get:
EAR = [1 + (APR / m)]m – 1
EAR = .17 = (1 + r)2 – 1; r = (1.17)1/2 – 1 = .0817 or 8.17% per six months
EAR = .17 = (1 + r)4 – 1; r = (1.17)1/4 – 1 = .0400 or 4.00% per quarter
EAR = .17 = (1 + r)12 – 1; r = (1.17)1/12 – 1 = .0132 or 1.32% per month
Notice that the effective six month rate is not twice the effective quarterly rate because of the
effect of compounding.
34. Here we are finding the annuity payment necessary to achieve the same FV. The interest rate
given is a 12 percent APR, with monthly deposits. We must make sure to use the number of months in
the equation. So, using the FVA equation:
Starting today:
FVA = C[{[1 + (.12/12) ]480 – 1} / (.12/12)]
C = $1,000,000 / 11,764.77 = $85.00
Starting in 10 years:
FVA = C[{[1 + (.12/12) ]360 – 1} / (.12/12)]
C = $1,000,000 / 3,494.96 = $286.13
Starting in 20 years:
FVA = C[{[1 + (.12/12) ]240 – 1} / (.12/12)]
C = $1,000,000 / 989.255 = $1,010.86
Notice that a deposit for half the length of time, i.e. 20 years versus 40 years, does not mean that the
annuity payment is doubled. In this example, by reducing the savings period by one-half, the deposit
necessary to achieve the same ending value is about twelve times as large.
38. Since your salary grows at 4 percent per year, your salary next year will be:
Next year’s salary = $50,000 (1 + .04)
Next year’s salary = $52,000
This means your deposit next year will be:
Next year’s deposit = $52,000(.05)
Next year’s deposit = $2,600
Since your salary grows at 4 percent, you deposit will also grow at 4 percent. We can use the
present value of a growing perpetuity equation to find the value of your deposits today. Doing so, we
find:
PV = C {[1/(r – g)] – [1/(r – g)] × [(1 + g)/(1 + r)]t}
PV = $2,600{[1/(.11 – .04)] – [1/(.11 – .04)] × [(1 + .04)/(1 + .11)]40}
PV = $34,399.45
Now, we can find the future value of this lump sum in 40 years. We find:
FV = PV(1 + r)t
FV = $34,366.45(1 + .11)40
FV = $2,235,994.31
This is the value of your savings in 40 years.
44. To solve this problem, we simply need to find the PV of each lump sum and add them
together. It is important to note that the first cash flow of $1 million occurs today, so we do not need
to discount that cash flow. The PV of the lottery winnings is:
PV = $1,000,000 + $1,500,000/1.09 + $2,000,000/1.092 + $2,500,000/1.093 + $3,000,000/1.094
+ $3,500,000/1.095 + $4,000,000/1.096 + $4,500,000/1.097 + $5,000,000/1.098
+ $5,500,000/1.099 + $6,000,000/1.0910
PV = $22,812,873.40
47. We want to find the value of the cash flows today, so we will find the PV of the annuity, and
then bring the lump sum PV back to today. The annuity has 18 payments, so the PV of the annuity is:
PVA = $4,000{[1 – (1/1.10)18] / .10} = $32,805.65
Since this is an ordinary annuity equation, this is the PV one period before the first payment, so it
is the PV at t = 7. To find the value today, we find the PV of this lump sum. The value today is:
PV = $32,805.65 / 1.107 = $16,834.48
52. The cash flows in this problem are semiannual, so we need the effective semiannual rate. The
interest rate given is the APR, so the monthly interest rate is:
Monthly rate = .10 / 12 = .00833
To get the semiannual interest rate, we can use the EAR equation, but instead of using 12 months as
the exponent, we will use 6 months. The effective semiannual rate is:
Semiannual rate = (1.00833)6 – 1 = .0511 or 5.11%
We can now use this rate to find the PV of the annuity. The PV of the annuity is:
PVA @ year 8: $7,000{[1 – (1 / 1.0511)10] / .0511} = $53,776.72
Note, this is the value one period (six months) before the first payment, so it is the value at year 8. So,
the value at the various times the questions asked for uses this value 8 years from now.
PV @ year 5: $53,776.72 / 1.05116 = $39,888.33
Note, you can also calculate this present value (as well as the remaining present values) using the
number of years. To do this, you need the EAR. The EAR is:
EAR = (1 + .0083)12 – 1 = .1047 or 10.47%
So, we can find the PV at year 5 using the following method as well:
PV @ year 5: $53,776.72 / 1.10473 = $39,888.33
The value of the annuity at the other times in the problem is:
PV @ year 3: $53,776.72 / 1.051110 = $32,684.88
PV @ year 3: $53,776.72 / 1.10475 = $32,684.88
PV @ year 0: $53,776.72 / 1.051116 = $24,243.67
PV @ year 0: $53,776.72 / 1.10478 = $24,243.67
55. The payment for a loan repaid with equal payments is the annuity payment with the loan
value as the PV of the annuity. So, the loan payment will be:
PVA = $42,000 = C {[1 – 1 / (1 + .08)5] / .08}
C = $10,519.17
The interest payment is the beginning balance times the interest rate for the period, and the principal
payment is the total payment minus the interest payment. The ending balance is the beginning
balance minus the principal payment. The ending balance for a period is the beginning balance for
the next period. The amortization table for an equal payment is:
Year Beginning Balance Total
Payment Interest
Payment Principal
Payment Ending
Balance
1 $42,000.00 $10,519.17 $3,360.00 $7,159.17 $34,840.83
2 34,840.83 10,519.17 2,787.27 7,731.90 27,108.92
3 27,108.92 10,519.17 2,168.71 8,350.46 18,758.47
4 18,758.47 10,519.17 1,500.68 9,018.49 9,739.97
5 9,739.97 10,519.17 779.20 9,739.97 0.00
In the third year, $2,168.71 of interest is paid.
Total interest over life of the loan = $3,360 + 2,787.27 + 2,168.71 + 1,500.68 + 779.20
Total interest over life of the loan = $10,595.86
64. First we will find the APR and EAR for the loan with the refundable fee. Remember, we need to
use the actual cash flows of the loan to find the interest rate. With the $2,300 application fee, you will
need to borrow $242,300 to have $240,000 after deducting the fee. Solving for the payment under
these circumstances, we get:
PVA = $242,300 = C {[1 – 1/(1.005667)360]/.005667} where .005667 = .068/12
C = $1,579.61
We can now use this amount in the PVA equation with the original amount we wished to borrow,
$240,000. Solving for r, we find:
PVA = $240,000 = $1,579.61[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]360}/ r]
Solving for r with a spreadsheet, on a financial calculator, or by trial and error, gives:
r = 0.5745% per month
APR = 12(0.5745%) = 6.89%
EAR = (1 + .005745)12 – 1 = 7.12%
With the nonrefundable fee, the APR of the loan is simply the quoted APR since the fee is not
considered part of the loan. So:
APR = 6.80%
EAR = [1 + (.068/12)]12 – 1 = 7.02%
65. Be careful of interest rate quotations. The actual interest rate of a loan is determined by the cash
flows. Here, we are told that the PV of the loan is $1,000, and the payments are $41.15 per month for
three years, so the interest rate on the loan is:
PVA = $1,000 = $41.15[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]36 } / r ]
Solving for r with a spreadsheet, on a financial calculator, or by trial and error, gives:
r = 2.30% per month
APR = 12(2.30%) = 27.61%
EAR = (1 + .0230)12 – 1 = 31.39%
It’s called add-on interest because the interest amount of the loan is added to the principal
amount of the loan before the loan payments are calculated.
69. The monthly payments with a balloon payment loan are calculated assuming a longer
amortization schedule, in this case, 30 years. The payments based on a 30-year repayment schedule
would be:
PVA = $750,000 = C({1 – [1 / (1 + .081/12)]360} / (.081/12))
C = $5,555.61
Now, at time = 8, we need to find the PV of the payments which have not been made. The balloon
payment will be:
PVA = $5,555.61({1 – [1 / (1 + .081/12)]12(22)} / (.081/12))
PVA = $683,700.32
Solutions to HW chap 7 (9th ed)
1. The yield to maturity is the required rate of return on a bond expressed as a nominal annual
interest rate. For noncallable bonds, the yield to maturity and required rate of return are
interchangeable terms. Unlike YTM and required return, the coupon rate is not a return used as the
interest rate in bond cash flow valuation, but is a fixed percentage of par over the life of the bond
used to set the coupon payment amount. For the example given, the coupon rate on the bond is still
10 percent, and the YTM is 8 percent.
6. To find the price of this bond, we need to realize that the maturity of the bond is 10 years. The
bond was issued one year ago, with 11 years to maturity, so there are 10 years left on the bond. Also,
the coupons are semiannual, so we need to use the semiannual interest rate and the number of
semiannual periods. The price of the bond is:
P = $34.50(PVIFA3.7%,20) + $1,000(PVIF3.7%,20) = $965.10
8. Here we need to find the coupon rate of the bond. All we need to do is to set up the bond
pricing equation and solve for the coupon payment as follows:
P = $924 = C(PVIFA3.4%,29) + $1,000(PVIF3.4%,29)
Solving for the coupon payment, we get:
C = $29.84
Since this is the semiannual payment, the annual coupon payment is:
2 × $29.84 = $59.68
And the coupon rate is the annual coupon payment divided by par value, so:
Coupon rate = $59.68 / $1,000
Coupon rate = .0597 or 5.97%
17. Initially, at a YTM of 8 percent, the prices of the two bonds are:
PJ = $20(PVIFA4%,18) + $1,000(PVIF4%,18) = $746.81
PK = $60(PVIFA4%,18) + $1,000(PVIF4%,18) = $1,253.19
If the YTM rises from 8 percent to 10 percent:
PJ = $20(PVIFA5%,18) + $1,000(PVIF5%,18) = $649.31
PK = $60(PVIFA5%,18) + $1,000(PVIF5%,18) = $1,116.90
The percentage change in price is calculated as:
Percentage change in price = (New price – Original price) / Original price
PJ% = ($649.31 – 746.81) / $746.81 = – 13.06%
PK% = ($1,116.90 – 1,253.19) / $1,253.19 = – 10.88%
If the YTM declines from 8 percent to 6 percent:
PJ = $20(PVIFA3%,18) + $1,000(PVIF3%,18) = $862.46
PK = $60(PVIFA3%,18) + $1,000(PVIF3%,18) = $1,412.61
PJ% = ($862.46 – 746.81) / $746.81 = + 15.49%
PK% = ($1,412.61 – 1,253.19) / $1,253.19 = + 12.72%
All else the same, the lower the coupon rate on a bond, the greater is its price sensitivity to
changes in interest rates.
18. The bond price equation for this bond is:
P0 = $1,068 = $46(PVIFAR%,18) + $1,000(PVIFR%,18)
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error we find:
R = 4.06%
This is the semiannual interest rate, so the YTM is:
4.06% = 8.12% YTM = 2
The current yield is:
Current yield = Annual coupon payment / Price = $92 / $1,068 = .0861 or 8.61%
The effective annual yield is the same as the EAR, so using the EAR equation from the previous
chapter: Effective annual yield = (1 + 0.0406)2 – 1 = .0829 or 8.29%
24. a. The bond price is the present value of the cash flows from a bond. The YTM is the
interest rate used in valuing the cash flows from a bond.
b. If the coupon rate is higher than the required return on a bond, the bond will sell at a
premium, since it provides periodic income in the form of coupon payments in excess of that required
by investors on other similar bonds. If the coupon rate is lower than the required return on a bond,
the bond will sell at a discount since it provides insufficient coupon payments compared to that
required by investors on other similar bonds. For premium bonds, the coupon rate exceeds the YTM;
for discount bonds, the YTM exceeds the coupon rate, and for bonds selling at par, the YTM is equal to
the coupon rate.
c. Current yield is defined as the annual coupon payment divided by the current bond price. For
premium bonds, the current yield exceeds the YTM, for discount bonds the current yield is less than
the YTM, and for bonds selling at par value, the current yield is equal to the YTM. In all cases, the
current yield plus the expected one-period capital gains yield of the bond must be equal to the
required return.
26. a. The coupon bonds have an 8% coupon which matches the 8% required return, so they
will sell at par. The number of bonds that must be sold is the amount needed divided by the bond
price, so:
Number of coupon bonds to sell = $30,000,000 / $1,000 = 30,000
The number of zero coupon bonds to sell would be:
Price of zero coupon bonds = $1,000/1.0460 = $95.06
Number of zero coupon bonds to sell = $30,000,000 / $95.06 = 315,589
b. The repayment of the coupon bond will be the par value plus the last coupon payment
times the number of bonds issued. So:
Coupon bonds repayment = 30,000($1,040) = $31,200,000
The repayment of the zero coupon bond will be the par value times the number of bonds
issued, so: Zeroes: repayment = 315,589($1,000) = $315,588,822
27. We found the maturity of a bond in Problem 22. However, in this case, the maturity is
indeterminate. A bond selling at par can have any length of maturity. In other words, when we solve
the bond pricing equation as we did in Problem 22, the number of periods can be any positive
number.
Challenge
29. To find the capital gains yield and the current yield, we need to find the price of the bond. The
current price of Bond P and the price of Bond P in one year is:
P: P0 = $120(PVIFA7%,5) + $1,000(PVIF7%,5) = $1,116.69
P1 = $120(PVIFA7%,4) + $1,000(PVIF7%,4) = $1,097.19
Current yield = $120 / $1,116.69 = .1075 or 10.75%
The capital gains yield is:
Capital gains yield = (New price – Original price) / Original price
Capital gains yield = ($1,097.19 – 1,111.69) / $1,116.69 = –.0175 or –1.75%
The current price of Bond D and the price of Bond D in one year is:
D: P0 = $60(PVIFA7%,5) + $1,000(PVIF7%,5) = $883.31
P1 = $60(PVIFA7%,4) + $1,000(PVIF7%,4) = $902.81
Current yield = $60 / $883.81 = .0679 or 6.79%
Capital gains yield = ($902.81 – 883.31) / $883.31 = +.0221 or +2.21%
All else held constant, premium bonds pay high current income while having price depreciation
as maturity nears; discount bonds do not pay high current income but have price appreciation as
maturity nears. For either bond, the total return is still 9%, but this return is distributed differently
between current income and capital gains.
Solutions to HW chap 8 (9th ed)
2. We need to find the required return of the stock. Using the constant growth model, we can
solve the equation for R. Doing so, we find:
R = (D1 / P0) + g = ($2.10 / $48.00) + .05 = .0938 or 9.38%
6. We know the stock has a required return of 11 percent, and the dividend and capital gains yield
are equal, so:
Dividend yield = 1/2(.11) = .055 = Capital gains yield
Now we know both the dividend yield and capital gains yield. The dividend is simply the stock
price times the dividend yield, so:
D1 = .055($47) = $2.59
This is the dividend next year. The question asks for the dividend this year. Using the relationship
between the dividend this year and the dividend next year:
D1 = D0(1 + g)
We can solve for the dividend that was just paid:
$2.59 = D0(1 + .055)
D0 = $2.59 / 1.055 = $2.45
11. Here we have a stock that pays no dividends for 10 years. Once the stock begins paying
dividends, it will have a constant growth rate of dividends. We can use the constant growth model at
that point. It is important to remember that general constant dividend growth formula is:
Pt = [Dt × (1 + g)] / (R – g)
This means that since we will use the dividend in Year 10, we will be finding the stock price in Year
9. The dividend growth model is similar to the PVA and the PV of a perpetuity: The equation gives you
the PV one period before the first payment. So, the price of the stock in Year 9 will be:
P9 = D10 / (R – g) = $10.00 / (.14 – .05) = $111.11
The price of the stock today is simply the PV of the stock price in the future. We simply discount
the future stock price at the required return. The price of the stock today will be:
P0 = $111.11 / 1.149 = $34.17
13. With supernormal dividends, we find the price of the stock when the dividends level off at a
constant growth rate, and then find the PV of the future stock price, plus the PV of all dividends
during the supernormal growth period. The stock begins constant growth in Year 4, so we can find
the price of the stock in Year 4, at the beginning of the constant dividend growth, as:
P4 = D4 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $2.00(1.05) / (.12 – .05) = $30.00
The price of the stock today is the PV of the first four dividends, plus the PV of the Year 3 stock
price. So, the price of the stock today will be:
P0 = $11.00 / 1.12 + $8.00 / 1.122 + $5.00 / 1.123 + $2.00 / 1.124 + $30.00 / 1.124 = $40.09
17. We are given the stock price, the dividend growth rate, and the required return, and are asked
to find the dividend. Using the constant dividend growth model, we get:
P0 = $64 = D0 (1 + g) / (R – g)
Solving this equation for the dividend gives us:
D0 = $64(.10 – .045) / (1.045)
D0 = $3.37
20. We can use the two-stage dividend growth model for this problem, which is:
P0 = [D0(1 + g1)/(R – g1)]{1 – [(1 + g1)/(1 + R)]T}+ [(1 + g1)/(1 + R)]T[D0(1 + g2)/(R – g2)]
P0 = [$1.25(1.28)/(.13 – .28)][1 – (1.28/1.13)8] + [(1.28)/(1.13)]8[$1.25(1.06)/(.13 – .06)]
P0 = $69.55
Solutions to HW chap 9 (new ed)
7. The IRR is the interest rate that makes the NPV of the project equal to zero. So, the equation
that defines the IRR for this project is:
0 = – $34,000 + $16,000/(1+IRR) + $18,000/(1+IRR)2 + $15,000/(1+IRR)3
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation, we
find that:
IRR = 20.97%
Since the IRR is greater than the required return we would accept the project.
8. The NPV of a project is the PV of the outflows minus the PV of the inflows. The equation for the
NPV of this project at an 11 percent required return is:
NPV = – $34,000 + $16,000/1.11 + $18,000/1.112 + $15,000/1.113 = $5,991.49
At an 11 percent required return, the NPV is positive, so we would accept the project.
The equation for the NPV of the project at a 30 percent required return is:
NPV = – $34,000 + $16,000/1.30 + $18,000/1.302 + $15,000/1.303 = –$4,213.93
At a 30 percent required return, the NPV is negative, so we would reject the project.
And the NPV at a 30 percent required return is:
NPV = –$19,500 + $9,800/1.3 + $10,300/1.32 + $8,600/1.33 = –$1,952.44
Notice that as the required return increases, the NPV of the project decreases. This will always be
true for projects with conventional cash flows. Conventional cash flows are negative at the beginning
of the project and positive throughout the rest of the project.
13. The IRR is the interest rate that makes the NPV of the project equal to zero. The equation to
calculate the IRR of Project X is:
0 = –$15,000 + $8,150/(1+IRR) + $5,050/(1+IRR)2 + $6,800/(1+IRR)3
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation, we
find that:
IRR = 16.57%
For Project Y, the equation to find the IRR is:
0 = –$15,000 + $7,700/(1+IRR) + $5,150/(1+IRR)2 + $7,250/(1+IRR)3
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation, we
find that:
IRR = 16.45%
To find the crossover rate, we subtract the cash flows from one project from the cash flows of the
other project, and find the IRR of the differential cash flows. We will subtract the cash flows from
Project Y from the cash flows from Project X. It is irrelevant which cash flows we subtract from the
other. Subtracting the cash flows, the equation to calculate the IRR for these differential cash flows is:
Crossover rate: 0 = $450/(1+R) – $100/(1+R)2 – $450/(1+R)3
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation, we
find that:
R = 11.73%
The table below shows the NPV of each project for different required returns. Notice that Project
Y always has a higher NPV for discount rates below 11.73 percent, and always has a lower NPV for
discount rates above 11.73 percent.
R $NPVX $NPVY
0% $5,000.00 $5,100.00
5% $3,216.50 $3,267.36
10% $1,691.59 $1,703.23
15% $376.59 $356.78
20% –$766.20 –$811.34
25% –$1,766.40 –$1,832.00
16. a. The profitability index is the PV of the future cash flows divided by the initial investment.
The cash flows for both projects are an annuity, so:
PII = $27,000(PVIFA10%,3 ) / $53,000 = 1.267
PIII = $9,100(PVIFA10%,3) / $16,000 = 1.414
The profitability index decision rule implies that we accept project II, since PIII is greater than
the PII.
b. The NPV of each project is:
NPVI = –$53,000 + $27,000(PVIFA10%,3) = $14,145.00
NPVII = –$16,000 + $9,100(PVIFA10%,3) = $6,630.35
The NPV decision rule implies accepting Project I, since the NPVI is greater than the NPVII.
c. Using the profitability index to compare mutually exclusive projects can be ambiguous
when the magnitude of the cash flows for the two projects are of different scale. In this problem,
project I is roughly 3 times as large as project II and produces a larger NPV, yet the profitability index
criterion implies that project II is more acceptable.
17. a. The payback period for each project is:
A: 3 + ($180,000/$390,000) = 3.46 years
B: 2 + ($9,000/$18,000) = 2.50 years
The payback criterion implies accepting project B, because it pays back sooner than project
A.
b. The discounted payback for each project is:
A: $20,000/1.15 + $50,000/1.152 + $50,000/1.153 = $88,074.30
$390,000/1.154 = $222,983.77
Discounted payback = 3 + ($390,000 – 88,074.30)/$222,983.77 = 3.95 years
B: $19,000/1.15 + $12,000/1.152 + $18,000/1.153 = $37,430.76
$10,500/1.154 = $6,003.41
Discounted payback = 3 + ($40,000 – 37,430.76)/$6,003.41 = 3.43 years
The discounted payback criterion implies accepting project B because it pays back sooner
than A.
c. The NPV for each project is:
A: NPV = –$300,000 + $20,000/1.15 + $50,000/1.152 + $50,000/1.153 + $390,000/1.154
NPV = $11,058.07
B: NPV = –$40,000 + $19,000/1.15 + $12,000/1.152 + $18,000/1.153 + $10,500/1.154
NPV = $3,434.16
NPV criterion implies we accept project A because project A has a higher NPV than project B.
d. The IRR for each project is:
A: $300,000 = $20,000/(1+IRR) + $50,000/(1+IRR)2 + $50,000/(1+IRR)3 + $390,000/(1+IRR)4
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation,
we find that:
IRR = 16.20%
B: $40,000 = $19,000/(1+IRR) + $12,000/(1+IRR)2 + $18,000/(1+IRR)3 + $10,500/(1+IRR)4
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation,
we find that:
IRR = 19.50%
IRR decision rule implies we accept project B because IRR for B is greater than IRR for A.
e. The profitability index for each project is:
A: PI = ($20,000/1.15 + $50,000/1.152 + $50,000/1.153 + $390,000/1.154) / $300,000 =
1.037
B: PI = ($19,000/1.15 + $12,000/1.152 + $18,000/1.153 + $10,500/1.154) / $40,000 = 1.086
Profitability index criterion implies accept project B because its PI is greater than project A’s.
f. In this instance, the NPV criteria implies that you should accept project A, while profitability
index, payback period, discounted payback, and IRR imply that you should accept project B. The final
decision should be based on the NPV since it does not have the ranking problem associated with the
other capital budgeting techniques. Therefore, you should accept project A.
18. At a zero discount rate (and only at a zero discount rate), the cash flows can be added together
across time. So, the NPV of the project at a zero percent required return is:
NPV = –$684,680 + 263,279 + 294,060 + 227,604 + 174,356 = $274,619
If the required return is infinite, future cash flows have no value. Even if the cash flow in one year
is $1 trillion, at an infinite rate of interest, the value of this cash flow today is zero. So, if the future
cash flows have no value today, the NPV of the project is simply the cash flow today, so at an infinite
interest rate:
NPV = –$684,680
The interest rate that makes the NPV of a project equal to zero is the IRR. The equation for the
IRR of this project is:
0 = –$684,680 + $263,279/(1+IRR) + $294,060/(1+IRR)2 + $227,604/(1+IRR)3 + 174,356/(1+IRR)4
Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error to find the root of the equation, we
find that:
IRR = 16.23%
Solutions to HW chap 10 (9th ed)
2. Sales due solely to the new product line are:
19,000($13,000) = $247,000,000
Increased sales of the motor home line occur because of the new product line introduction; thus:
4,500($53,000) = $238,500,000
in new sales is relevant. Erosion of luxury motor coach sales is also due to the new mid-size
campers; thus:
900($91,000) = $81,900,000 loss in sales
is relevant. The net sales figure to use in evaluating the new line is thus:
$247,000,000 + 238,500,000 – 81,900,000 = $403,600,000
3. We need to construct a basic income statement. The income statement is:
Sales $ 830,000
Variable costs 498,000
Fixed costs 181,000
Depreciation 77,000
EBT $ 74,000
Taxes@35% 25,900
Net income $ 48,100
4. To find the OCF, we need to complete the income statement as follows:
Sales $ 824,500
Costs 538,900
Depreciation 126,500
EBT $ 159,100
Taxes@34% 54,094
Net income $