MECH 310 Homework Assignment 3 Solution, Fall 2013
American University of Beirut · Thermodynamics I · 4 pages · Dr. Fadl Moukalled · with solution
More MECH 310 files
- Homework Assignment 1 Solution · Fall 2013Homework · with solutionView
- Homework Assignment 2 · Fall 2013HomeworkView
- Homework 2 · Spring 2011HomeworkView
- Homework 3 · Spring 2011HomeworkView
- Homework 2 · Spring 2011HomeworkView
- Essay Chapter 3 · Fall 2017ChapterView
- Exam 2 Solution Leen Alawieh · Fall 2017Exam · with solutionView
- Exam 1 Leen Alawieh With Solutions · Fall 2017Exam · with solutionView
Show the text of this homework
Homework 3 Solutions
Problem 1
Look up the specific volume and enthalpy for the inlet conditions.
Specific volume = 0.16849 m3/kg and Enthalpy = 3251.6 kJ/kg
(a) Use the volumetric flow rate, area and specific volume to determine the inlet velocity = 42.1 m/s
Perform a first law balance over the control volume (note that PE and W are zero)
From the balance determine the enthalpy of the exit stream, which is equal to 3211.9 kJ/kg
(b) From the tables (given the exit pressure and enthalpy) determine the exit temperature = 378.6oC
Problem 2
Take the turbine as the system (control volume).
At the inlet conditions, and from the two intensive properties specified, the following information can be
obtained:
Steam is superheated and the enthalpy at the inlet is equal to 3247.6 kJ/kg
At the turbine exit, it is clear that a saturated liquid stream emerges and at 15 kPa (given the quality), the
enthalpy can be calculated to be equal to 2361.01 kJ/kg
From the information given:
hi = 3283.4 kJ/kg and he = 2361.01 kJ/kg, thus ∆h = -886.6 kJ/kg
KEi = 1.25 kJ/kg, KEe= 16.2 kJ/kg, thus ∆KE = 14.95 kJ/kg
PEi = 0.0981 kJ/kg, PEe= 0.0589kJ/kg, thus ∆PE = -0.0392 kJ/kg
(b) w = -[∆h + ∆KE + ∆PE] = 871.7 kJ/kg
(c) The required mass flow rate for a 5 MW power plant is = 5000 kJ/s/ 871.7 kJ/kg = 5.74 kg/s
Two observations can be made from these results. First, the change in potential energy is insignificant in
comparison to the changes in enthalpy and kinetic energy. This is typical for most engineering devices.
Second, as a result of low pressure and thus high specific volume, the steam velocity at the turbine exit can be
very high. Yet the change in kinetic energy is a small fraction of the change in enthalpy (less than 2 percent in
our case) and is therefore often neglected.
Problem 3
Problem 4
From Tables B it can be ascertained that state 1 is a compressed liquid. Furthermore
it can be assumed that:
And that
Problem 5
For the co-current heat exchanger, the heat duty is given by:
Flow rate of hot stream * Specific Heat Capacity of hot stream * temperature difference for hot stream=
(7/2)*8.314*(1/1000)*(400-350) = 1.45 kW
This duty is also equal to
Flow rate of cold stream * Specific Heat Capacity of cold stream * temperature difference for cold stream =
̇ *(7/2)*8.314 * (340 – 300)
Therefore the flow rate of the cold stream in the co-current heat exchanger will be equal to: 1.25 mol/s
For the counter-current heat exchanger, the heat duty identical to that calculated for the co-current heat
exchanger = 1.45 kW
Using the same argument as above, the flow rate of the cold stream in the counter current heat exchanger
̇ *(7/2) * 8.314*(390 – 300) = 1,450
Therefore, the flow rate of the cold stream = 0.554 mol/s
The counter current configuration is more efficient than the co-current heat exchanger (for the same cooling
heat duty, a lesser amount of cooling fluid is required)