PSPA 213 Midterm, Fall 2000
American University of Beirut · Survey of International Relations · 7 pages
More PSPA 213 files
Show the text of this exam
wat we
aay ding Roem
RESERVE Resorve foe
P.S.P.A. 213 _ Name: NeMaclet W\aa lar
Prof. Nawaf Salam r.
—_—
Mid-Term Exam
Fall 2004
Illustre each of the following concepts with a relevant example :
e 1- Vulnerability in interdependence
> ~he Cush of We sto clkk mnaciwelk. fa 1A89
Shes
—
Y¥ 2- Linkage as a bargaining method
@ 3- Feeling of “relative deprivation”
Germany gelb a relative deprivahen fa garolkel to Yn
oMner colo ar UXO, Guntrea (ewro REG ) Thoda
ere TASK WEST pee . Te fehl lke its pla ce
Wweoan bk! fay
Ahnculed ged wm Mc Gornrkd acene
SsotE checrdach melee
“ AS KREAC ca ask Hee
iS the ‘ ane .
Tank ia ww wd Tt. Ve sha ys ekowial
ecApyoe
y
bee Parliamentary diplomacy
When & Me pea of ave ROMY aemeank & cx Tepre centet
iA aaverenr EAT ON ky chour Pet clken EAN CY cottoce.
VaR cat Cee Wo a meant cf (aire nce
whea Genecal se aerav 4 BOAT Rress Leow
OC ceants} urs ano, \ bo Aey \e setk Le Loo
~ \
tae Teraeti - Galea ine
nc at. NEY a\
5- Environmental probabilism €v-¢ “> a
e
Tk ots wae ROSE EA oN of a cerckaia mean be Vatlence
Xe .
K Hagelean ale bK Km Galdw (ER Anwrecken Gc
ne picleae bomb a 2 UH we acrteer wuld he
PRED Genk ok Ane YS in LAU ; ‘G wwan SE Anh l wa4uy
Hyak Aw wren feo beeak these come and it Wry
Usech by Mme OS ones Sagan
A Deal moh haieeen
ROO, ot
‘ ue At BN oe. a ‘
kD
a 6- Alliances to control alliance partners
roa O cM
Jans Fi
» 7- Granting of rewards
1 Wien Q COM ANTY a AAR anckeu CN EY o
reward For Weliag ON,
fy nd
—
e 8- Alliances as
Tn srmld Wh Le +19 Gorenve aad Wele AWance
were alec oor her , x0 { & one ws foo ge nly Coen
: ste a lhoesk nkenes _— a)
Wer oN its allvred POAT MEAS BALL be dee ged ag Goel
teak QA uhy Wrc So gplsded and (hb Reeoe a
Werld Wor. be coud Wess were ehh aikees fae FP tre oro jechy
cP force teh Q\eck . .
TAN seh, eypeyRid] pree oot ep
USY VS Gabe.
gz
ww
<oD
ws ’
pe
e 9- Regional and limited purpase IG@
Tmieagoveramenta TGant tanon, (TGO's) Uke we
Uncle nakions SEPMimitedk bY wea. memb ASHP .
ANC LEGiond and Koni ted BARE of TO. arc £2001 DA
Ulex Green FALE which Wi ked to Hae cowl COMMER, LE ach
. . . >
WX RRA eh or the ALA Wecitha RANI RAMON Which Kaye
A PUAPSSC FO We nealtn oO Ware Re gicakion .
They ack Ut “Ne PAMission of alk state,
VG.
. tas KOA
€ 10-Multinationals a$ political actor
TE Cola Cle chy vs Mulhall oral COP RET AIK OW
gets ouN cH a ce harcan weal counmdc 4 TY Gn distatry W Ve.
And inka ral « COMENY of BAW WUNAS y.
e 11-Intangible elements of capabilities
Ag carang ble clement of cavalo v. Ker Oo vane gen ce ;
2NO>
Some HAY AC) an ye con't ruc” Clee Mac atte of tHe koX
TareVrqence we nour Wr OX Ecc vemk Ur aaumestancy of
haggeniag tes, hee to grediich and Hamer Parc moves
A the enemi ern; i€ Your inkellgence Ww ack aRRechive ENORS
Yu tan ve Wicked 4 +
. = “tae CA Ca hece
fey une tae United ‘Stakes werd roy acess “
in nc inacdeaky 9& aril Harbor.
eo ee
The event Anak occnredh on ane 1h of segtem bea =>
Tre US necer gaur it COMA \ 4
12-Fractionation as a bargaining method we ON wip Pee
, gaining erat
‘ ron an 7
et \AN Ss? Ly \ _ oe ata’
ie , . _£ An a 4 4 Ao
No Taare wom
1OND -
eux CSS UNt€. ro
ose
locoe
> {ki 3-lmportance of venue in negotiations
anna Ane locaton a SEY Con Fok ARY asreck ia
5 MaGRAN OND | Verchiry wae Ae ge Karena, Counsel ey
PSeRRA neakeal COrnteies jw ba Gain ah.
Te coe -gaiea tine aArgeolkarons ~were weld ta Oslou
q /4-Freezing assets as a means of influence
| Tw RKcecze We @82 8 ancthor coandyias UW Vrevertress
fH fo use i, ey
a
a -\
o) S Pars & Cgbo an COMA pad
VI
e 1& Transformation of a “multipolar system into a “bipolar”
A Kh polan Sysvemn witch OG ence competion betweed
erotis of a aimilar or equrah aopabalter among
gach ober Uhowever BHEN B® MAN eusrem koaasters
invo O Vrgolan oyster ie wrcans Yaak fe PUA have
weakly Wen ank there arc A MALA EtMslemMy on Mac
CxN ithe treigkee Gente (Gane, , Sctitaca and Russi
and Wwe Awrple A ance ( Germany
UAC Som nated tre Weagary and Tholy
acenc bere weld WOT
0) :
e 16-Boycott as a means of influence Sead Li K~
Do agcote BACH A Phe RUE CE EM Poranons
& Lebanon cannot ONT OY Tacne Qvoducks
~~.
to KKe Coakey ad wel, a most arab slakey . Tho O
A Means of Souence were Xsracl amit do
ANNA obo Jf |
4
S
» 17-Potential capabilitis ™
Coe. on Wry ax rand» ine Mee Use ae nmrclear
WER RENE (Ae Fetal RNA AI ws CO, a
aN ON gorwany omeans of iafloence
x
Wok envi PN ° \ feaus WS NANOS
Cro pag Shay C La any Oy 7 uN fos Nae
Tune ny : se ove N
: - NE ANS is ian
OA. LEAN :
- ex or wre ‘
8 18-Use of force as a method of Geniilation) rot (pon
the dvol sf Mac atomic. bomb in VOUS low
the Unctedl Stalk, o1fK Biro shina and Neakacakd
iN Danan so inflscencr Tagan bo suAnender
In utd Wan GT |
t
NEXOVE > CANE OY Aw sn lhAFTS
bo (ie vee tt WH PLY
, cas AN A
—~ Fone es ALPOAN SUIS “™
° aa 9-Importance of the “identity” of parties in negotiations
FOr en, should ve iden Red COR CAD Walnonk be CLE
STONE Sa Kes OS ast ops eat Ee POX Ke PONT cepa ke . n Whheke
me . era in roliow ovaa vi 2alyoy
heqetioa lions hee \tne CLO ay x ealdsntan. )
ACHAC sembolixe J co LAenredk ao
Lean eust PaALTYy
THE Bonn or fer ros O& AAO
4o t ac
Voss
Ho ane
: ox <720-Multination State «
A Stok, orth dk fferent natrcona ¢