ECON 211 Final, Spring 2003
American University of Beirut · Elementary Microeconomics Theory · 9 pages
More ECON 211 files
- Notes COURSE SUMMARY ECON 211 FOR FINAL · Fall 2017Final examView
- Final Sample · Summer 2011Final examView
- Final Moodle Exam · Summer 2008Final examView
- Midterm · Spring 2019ExamView
- Useful File Previouses · Fall 2018FileView
- Useful File Test Banks Version 1 · Spring 2016FileView
- Useful File Test Banks Version 2 · Spring 2016FileView
- Lecture Chapter Five · Spring 2015LabView
Show the text of this final exam
www.amal-aub.org
If~htrc
is z change in legklaubn that maka it
easier for hospiuls to subsrituc other h d t h are
'profcsrionzls for nurses, &en the demand for
nurses will become
I s s s ~ c
. '@
more elasdc
$ &is chmge will nor &ect the clsrdc
m a d for nukes
@ fir= more elasdc, then less d&dc
= M else equal, if violins arc produced using a pro-
ducdon process in,which capital &or:
be readily
substitured'fbr labor, &en the
Ib.
8 dem-sd for labor will be highly elaric.
demznd for labor wiU be somewhat el
rl&
.@ demad for labor will be unit dmic
dunand for ,labor will be inelvdc
-
m.
,%en
rhe price of rbe produn it
rise,
I
. - .
che iirm's
@- ' dcpsnd for labor cunpc shifcs righmrd.
dunvrd for labor cuntc s h i i Ihvard.
.
3O
demand for labor c w c rernlins unchan~cd.
@ o u ~ u c
decreases.
,
0
m -4 &mi demand fcjr labor cunl:
# is rh: same u its mar,oinal roltnut produff of-
R. . +,
shou-shoy
labor w e . mu& labor the firm him at diF:rcnr
Baed on tb,e prod~aion and revenue
. .
.
wag::atLJ.
.
. ' 4
@ ' S&
iighmbBTd when the price of the firm's
output increas:~.
Q.
- .. - -QLL of the above answers u e corrm.
-
4
pl
Afore infpnnation is needed to deter
price of the product.
4%
d&md for labor depends on:
It
I.
T c h o l o g
m Based on h e produaion md ra!cnue
II.
Prim of resources orher than labor
above table, i f h e w*te
is S20 pa
III. Price ofthe product.
9) IandIf
-
4
.
@
IIandlIl
Q) IandIII
.
@ . 1,IIandrn
I '
.
.
If rhe current u 4 e (W)
than the maiginzl
rmcnue product CiKRP), &en thc &a should
.
A
h
&ouldhire more workers as Ic
I9
I
h i r e l m l a b o r , x t t i & ~ i n a ~ e r h e ~ .
i . & hire morc labor, &hi&
e.
.
@ hire no morc or I& 1
\ i $ .
gratcxwhcn W e
hire more labor, becausehiring more labor will
h a a e &e Wand lMRP und &q are. equal
-#fa
5nn &at can sd irs'output for $40 1
.
dedd? ro inC;ea,se io labor fore h m 4
1;.
. .
Whicb of &e following indicates that a firm is
to hi, and burput incrasa fiom 15 to
maikzing its profit7
1
@ , , the marginal mrenuc product ofhe 5di
&
'I.
M@
rev-..
eq&
rn*
cost
M+d
a 1.14. revenue product quaL the uw
5 m. no+.
I
4:
1 01
%t$
I md 4.
-6 NC?;LW
T nnr TT
www.amal-aub.org
. ..
'
. .
'm Xr -31~'~uaa;i~
of labor incrtrs~, mat$nd rme:
- nut product for a perfccily compctiuve &in
I) ' d e u a s bctarlse chc firm must Io\vei flee to
+ sd a h e r quanriry.
@' .& $:aeasr because the m'qind prodl::,: :. ' fabc
. .- d:creass,
. -
9 &creua b&aust marghd revewe dzc-i. : *r.
-a
4s CO-~
~ S C ~ U K
margin4 i&ftiiy
cc .?..Ear
. ".,
w Tic demand for productive rcsod&js &?;.-TI
b;
h e demand for goods and ~ e d ~ ~ r ' & d t t . - : .
:
' :.
rbac resource. This phenomenon is refcrr: .: . :. :. .
d) ducicdun&d '
I) , joint demand
)) inverse demand. .
dtriveddmarld
-
w ib: marginal revenue produce of labor Ir .I :ii.
25
"
i#
316 change in r o d revenue obtained &urn pr:
ducing one more unit of output, ' _,
Lh: change in output fTom hi&&
OFE: ~
3
3
~
worker.
4 rbc change
r o d revenue from biting or.;
. more worlicr.
W A prisoners' &-a-r).pe
'
)) yid* a do&mr rtfanigy non-mopcnrire
quilibriuni in z sir@lqplajl of the ,we.
9 ria7 yidd a cbopsra~+.dvc quilibdum in a re- ,
p a d p
e
if playas : ~communica~tr
mar yidd a coopmdyc eqvilibrivm in fie-
. pmcd p
e
$ players fear each otbk
#@ PJ1 of h c above answers are correct.
Th: .9BC M d Company has entered b t c .t :::6
n'\re 2gtocment wich Ehc 0 t h firm In chc ;.?tj>a
rhe DC Nail Company. What occurs in the :,,xi
indamy ifABC decides m cheat on &c %gee-
*
inkc?
I
I ABCloweir rhe p&ghorin n&.
: Y The rod iodumy o$ut
inaeps.
: 0 Tbe m d profits in $naif
indusog d i tie-
.
Psise
-
.,; 0.) Mof The abavt YlscPcrs are &am
_ .
L
8
.
-v --
--
I=
Ifborh h
in a, duopolg chat on a mz. LL:~
z&x.ixlermt,
&G
,.-
..--;
.-,:
kill ill a d borh firms pie)t#y@,
1) pricks will rise and b a & h s ace wo&E
, prices wdl &U and borh &-.ate
wse OE
- pdw nill dre and b
o
h
s
k
r
cE
L -. -
.
the pbsloimWe-a,
rhe dominant
&c dominant -w &&&J;,
.
.
.
' - 7v
die domioror
djpco;lr; p?l 1.7~
:
ib I .,.
. r te Phficr
reaas-
--
4i@!
' dcie is no d o m b r &Ti&.
www.amal-aub.org
In a prisoners' dilemma ,parj;le, which nB
loaing suatcgies gives the best outcon~s
. . prisoners?
Both deny (collusion).
Both confess (nor collude).
, O)
One confesses while the other dcnio.
\one of rhe above
q). -: .
.. .
I
~h~~
two can companies, -4mcricm znd Na-
, n.
'
,
donal =tbch have entered into 2 collbsiv: qc- I
.I
konomic
in monopolistic corn!
~h~ pay~ffmitriv of economic profits is
.. definitely lcads to
abo\*e. .If 6031 firms cheat on the cohikc qree-
)
' . a . ldraud sh.& in each firm's demxci
men!,
what mount of economic profit is earned.
- , niw f % ~ s
';nter , h e market
by,'lmerican?
'.
@ a righrupard shii in each firm's
@' SO
2s new firms enter rhe marker:.
S3,OOO
"
u, upuzd SM in each firm's cost c
@ S4,OOO
:
firms enter the market.
, @ -52,000
-411 of the above anmrers are correct.
81 Tber: arc two can companies, .'knzriiican and Nz-
I
w A firm is said to have excess ctpacity u
tionll &ch
have entered into a coUui\*e q ~ -
II) it produces a lcvel of output such thc
m a t T h e p2yoff matrix of economic proSrs is h
g a t e r than mar,Gal cost.
abo\*:. If National is able ro cheat on the
@ it
a levd of output such rhz
m a t bur -4merican complies with th: zgetm=nt,
I
.
revenue is greater than rnargn4 COSK
a.ha amount of economic
dl1 be earned by
I
Q ir products a level of output smder 1
?r'ationu'?
I
' which minimizes average cod cosr
s2,ooo
@
it produces a lsvd of output laser ch
@
S3,OOO
which minimizes average total COX.
9. S4,OOO
'
@ S6,OOO
-
OT7hich of chefollo~ing is TRUE abou
\
~ = b n b g monopolixically cornpetit
I
. .
. I
I
.
ics long-run equilibrium?
Oiigopolis are always characterized u
P=MC.
producing identical goods. '
@ P=MR.
producing differendated soods. .
Q ATC = MC.
.) colluding whenever possible.
a P=ATC.
' - ,
h a k g h i s whose prim and quandds depmd
on rhe piices and quantities ser by the 0th:~ 7
- -.cr
w When comparing pcrfcct compeuuon
competing firms.
. .
nopolisdc compedtion, we find that
In the long-run equilibrium, firms in a mono?o-
listidp competitive indusuy produce at an our-
- -
put Inel where
P>ATCburMR=MC. -
P > ATCandMR > MC.
P=ATC&~MR=
MC.
P = A T C ~ ~ ~ M R >
MC.
monopolisrically competirive firms pr
identical producrs Like perfedy comp
' C rums
monopolisridy cornpea~ve firms fa.:
to enuy, unlike perfectly compcnhrc
adveriisiing plays a large role in wor;o?
compeution, d i k e in pcrf~cc comyct
monopolisJcally competirive h
s
u . 1 :
I
ers like perfectly comiedrive 6im.s.
c
When nzw firms cnm a modopolLddy corn-
pecitive indusuy'
.
Which of the following is not me?
@ each t i s i n g &mas &miiict-aiw: rhifo k h t -
ward
() Both monopolies &d monopolisri&
each &&g
h n ' s demand curve sbiirr I&-
p=drive firms can determine what pri
StL
- Rard.
@ each a i s i q ws
margin4 mn a w e s b i i ~
6..
h.the long -,
borh monoPofie a-I
ri&md
-
kc& compeudve &s
earn ao c;:
:
@
Pirdng h Y s
muginaI con curve shiiD
kfkud'
Q E ~ m o n o p o ~ i e s
and monopo~irrial
pctirive h u s produce so thae MR eq:
Produa d;&rcndadon.cxists wirhin an induscig if
]B h the shorr nui, both monopolit-s 27-
@
are no subnirntcs f6r a podua.
p~ltddally comperiuve firms c m -J.
nomic profit
n'
.
there ire dose but not perfect subsrirutes for a
www.amal-aub.org
iw . : c 5
Cocsidcr rhe moaopoh dcpiaed i::
:i c T,:,
above. The
m&izing
lwei ::' c :zpt,
singl:-price monopolist is
Consider 31c monopolist depicted in h e iig
above. The price a sin~le-price rnpnopalist F
& z g e for &e profir-maximizing 1ci.d clfdu~
. ? ' Sll. .
2 th: abose figure illusuared a p:rfccdy corn.
J ~ l e industry, the equilibrium indw* ;!;ip.pu
.would be cqud ro ..
If the above fi,we iUusuatcd a p~rfen;~
r.c~c
die in'dusuy, rhc qu$ibriurn indunr). ;rice
would be equal to
1)1 In rhe above figure, if a ~in~le-~dfc
z:cr-c.;3:
. .
maximized irs profiqcrhe deadwei&c
c.i:=
.n
m&e
is qua - to the area
Pa EI the long-run, a singllepricc JZOGC+:~*$. A
@ not be able to condnue ro GUR CCC~C::&:~ pr
and will break men with h normal ~ I & L '
@. be able ro continue to cam eoonn~rlc r-infiu
. .. long as the &&et runain~ a mancy.:,;;~.
Q end up being regdated by the gov?~.!ear: t
cause it is dg
short-run economic profit
- - -
www.amal-aub.org
o
4
8 1012
16 20
24
Quanfiiy (units per d3y) -
7-
i
Tn: above figuie depicts a monopolisdali!- corn-
ptdrive firm. What is &: profit m
d
~
g
level .
of ourput the firm\dpaduct:
- - -
-
4 units per day
@ 8 units per day
1Ounitspcrday
I6 unics pcr day
y
-
m The above figure depics a monop~Esticcl;~
com-
p:drive firm. W a c pricc should the itm charge?
Tn: above fi,we depicn a rnonopolLdcallr com-
. . .
.
p:udve firm. At the proSr rnammang lad of
. ,
ourpur,
4 rbc firm is making economic profir.
@
the firm incurs an economic loss.
h e &m is maliing zero economic pofir
'
1) this iirm would choose co shut domi in &:
p The above figure depicu a m o n o p o l i s d ~
com- .
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ & m a x f m i z i n ~ d , d - -
ourput, cxcess capaiiy for the firm is e&al to:
4 uni= per day.
' . .
i 3 8 uniapu day.
: '
1 6 u n i r ~ p ~ r d i ~ .
-
- -
-
-AS
a r d r of using rhe har30in'al cost priciq rule
.
KO rtgulatc a natural monopoly,
-. 8
the nanual monopoly will incur an economic
4)
h e d
monopoly tarns a normal profir
(I) rhemonopol.ist produces an in&dcni amount
of ~ r o d u u - . .
' 0 . ,
I ) ~ h ; m o n o ~ o h
i r . ~ o w h o v e r ~II
is tons
5
and cam a normal profit
: -
'. .
.! . .
.wIa rhe case of a
p r i c . - d i s ~ ~ ~
mo-
&::.:.
... . .s noply, &ere is no
.:*,';*<if
;.:
:
:, ?<<. ,'; . ..
%=-., !.;,;.
. C .
@ d
u
of consumer surplus to the producrr.
Quontity (units psi t
-..-.. - ... . . - " .--...-
"
Ln &e above fi3pe, the monopoIisucGg..
pediv: firm producs
- - - - - -
-6 72j72jznT~ei
6 e price at Pj.
8) Q2 and secs h c pricc.at P,.
- 6
$ Q1
a d scts the price at PI.
0, Q, and s:ts chc price at Pj.
6 Jn che above fi,pc of a rnonopolisudy co
p:cirive iirm, the mareal cost of rhe I2si a
produc:d
is
:qua1 to Pi a?d is greater than rnar,$nal rc
@ cqual to P3 and is grcatci thin mar,&d
r c
e q d to PI and is grata than muginil rr
-.
equal to PI and isequal to marginal reven,
W In the =bow f i p e of a monopolistically cc
pctidve firm, the area of economic profie is
Q ADB
e ABC
P P P 4
() P2FEP
- - - -
-. L - - - - - - - - - -
w The above f i p e shows a.monopolisdcai!~
pc-
6rm. The fiDguic
# is only nlyl
Pu.adon, bccaki*.
is +g
an ecoho&ic profit.
.,.
# could be either a short-m or long-r. i>
don beause monopolistically corrrp&.e~
can cam an economic profit in the long-I.,
@ is onty a long-run jllusnacion becauJc -k.-z
carning only a normal ~rofir.
@ is neither a short- nor i long--
illurmdc
Ln ih; above figure, $ rhe long run, ebi. ~r
poltddly comPeri& h
d
produce more output at a h
p
no chinge in costs of producdon.
4 prodm lsa output zr a IOWU pricc, ::pi:
-
no
in. cosrs of
produce the same quanriy at rhc same pG(
Anv of rbr rhovc "rr nnerihlr
www.amal-aub.org
~i';in~le-~rice
monopolist udl always prodc
,
xi-here rhe elasriciy of demand
is grcaru &an 1.
8 ;dzll~*en
I.
a e q h &iv.
w -4 monopolisr that opcntcfdous~ d:c :
c
.
4
,
of ie dunand .will find that
d
e
?bo\>e gives the dtmand for a monoPo-
@, t o d revenue iricr&es nhm price 2.. r. : : ..
@ r o d revenue decreases when a,.i:r:
,t . ., .
() mu+aI revenue is neg2rivc
,
I) iris more profitable to o p u ~
dml; r'..~ .
dc mge of + demand a&
,d
;4 5
m Far a s;a~!e-~hce monopolis,
() M R - P ~ M ~ .
.
M R &st increases and then decrzar: ;viv
* MR
< dwal.s.
quanu~sold
,
@ . M R firsr decrcaser and hen incraqc
quinriv sold
I :
. w -4 monopolist can
s:U is much PS he or she wanu at &c rhos
price bccause he or sb: is rb: o n l ~
sk!c:, -
I). '.: . inamst pricc and quulrir). sdd r: rhc
cimt.,
4 r ' - incrase pri@.onlj. if hc or she is v4.k
decrease the quantity sold
U is nor~resni~c-d'b~
the law of dzmuld.
A n z d monopoly is defined ir:
.
a marker in d3ch cornperidon and w q
2
?he uble above $vej rbe demvld for a monopo-
miaed by the p r i n g of? pVFnrpieL; fie
' lids output. Wbar is the inarp;ld revenue when
.
, an indumy in which one firm can SU;+(\;~ r.
' entire matket at a lower price &an ni.3 or ;
h.
i
a market in
compe"ti{% aid rcvy u
s a i d by rhe-g&idng of a patent
. '
any marka w b e one &m consumtcs h e c
illdusny.
L
.
I
.
If the go~emmcnc p r r a 6rm a ptb2.2: ,CI.a
to supply aid, asm-trnoPolp is a ~ l f c d
i7
@ annrunlbatricrrn.cntry,
: ' *
alegdbudermcnq.
-.
-
n
I P~CC*
011
r
U'
-- # All of chc above amwm are corzt:~s
0
operaring in a price h g e
186 Which of h e following is NiQT a deds'lcn 6
musr make in the short run! 3..
0 4 ~ h d e r
m enarorlcxve .n in
i) ' Whnher m produq,or shk d-
- %at
qul.tiqm p a u p
1
'-
@ None of &e &
o
w
:
~
arc mxrcrz i:iza~
d are decisions firttrz m.w m$ce in h e S ~ O .
"
Nn.
-
I:
=q
I f s m
-
-
d c i e ma
i c w ~ d d
for its pj
itwoddwzmxms
rnand for i~
ir would be in rhe dmi
for its produa
it &
be
rcvaw b~
www.amal-aub.org
.(~~ovcs
per dzy) 1
(dollars)
'
0
80
w The above table show rhe p;i dry rbd con for
Kilv's Buebd Glove Cornpm)-. Ercb glove is
priced ar S50 and Kiley's B~cball Glov: Corn-
p a y is a perfectly cornpetidv: firm. ~em:;n
whjch two outpbr le~~cls
doa Kileyls E ~ r b r l l
Glol-: Cornpan!. carn an economic ~ r o +
1Jr In pellea cornp:drion,
1) &: r;;uk=r dcrr.2nd for &: good is p:ri:dy
clzsuc but the dcmand for the ourpur of on:
iirm is nor perfectly clascie
a h e ~jz~ket
demvld for 31: good is nor p:if:cdy
tlasGc but h e demand for the output of on:
, '
' firm is pcrfecrly elasdc
,
' @ both rhc market demand for A: good and the
. dcrnad for the ourpur of on: &m arc p:riedy
dxdc ..
neirher ch'e market dcmand for h e good nor rh:
dcmad for the ourput of on: i;rm is p:rfedy
tlasuc
. .
Pedealy compcdrive firms h2ve a r o d revrnue
cunle &at is
() upuvd sloping wi& incresiq slope
@
domuwd sloping wirh c o m t slope
upxrd sloping with dccreasiq slop-
! .' @ upuvd sloping with constant slopz
b(
lf demand for Farmer John's maple syrup is ine-
kc,
then whcn Farmer John raiss the pn'ce of '
:
' maplesyup. his rota rcvenuc will
.
O
-
. inatzse
X
* depsre
C
-
li - - -
@ srayrhe same .
83 probably change, but more idbnnauon is
needed ro determine if the r o d revenue iF.-
creases, decreases, or nays the same
I.ncrcasing oppomtnity con is due KO
firms' needs to eun mere and more profin.
@ tverinaeasingmxes.
. a ihe fk
ht it is morc difEculr m use r e s o w
. &den&- the more sodm vrodum.
'
the fim Qn resources are nor qua& suired for
..-
-
-
* s , ~ .
0 sib.
* S22.
Co.osider the perfectly compeciuve firm
above &we. Whar'will the fum choose
the shon-run a d why?
(D Shut d o ~ n
lgcause the firm i n k s an
. loss.
0 sap iqb%Ur
b e m e
hrn is rns
;> 23 2- ?L -
econom.teprofit
Sray in business because the h ' r cco.
. -
is 1s &an fixed corn.
'
8 ST in business, bur produce a Wem
ourpuc, because the 6rm incurs an ecci
loss. .
:
Consider the perfccdy m r n p c d ~ v c ~ ~ -
above figure. At what price will long-nu
rim o m ?
0 Sll.
y '$12. -
' * $22. A .
%3.
If demand is inelastic, an i n m e in &c
4) dea-
tad revenue
O inqease r o d revenue
K
a ----
L -----
1
www.amal-aub.org
www.amal-aub.org