ECO 226 Problems Chapter 6 Solution, Spring 2017
Haigazian University · Public Finance · 1 page · Mr. Garabed Boghossian · with solution
Stuck on a question? A tutor can walk you through it.
More ECO 226 files
- Problems Chapter 1 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
- Problems Chapter 10 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
- Problems Chapter 11 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
- Problems Chapter 12 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
- Problems Chapter 2 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
- Problems Chapter 3 Solution · Spring 2017Chapter · with solutionView
Show the text of this chapter
CHAPTER 6
Cost-Benefit Analysis and
Government Investments
ANSWERS TO TEXT PROBLEMS
1.
The ratio of the price of the highway interchange to the price of the cardiac intensive care unit is 2.
The ratio of the marginal products of the two programs and their current output levels is 10/3 = 3.33.
Because the ratio of marginal products exceeds that ratio of prices, the current mix of programs is
not cost-effective. To improve cost-effectiveness, more highway interchanges should be built and
fewer cardiac units should be produced. As this occurs, the marginal product of highway interchanges
will fall, while the marginal product of cardiac units will rise. Cost-effectiveness is achieved when
the ratio of marginal products is adjusted to equal 2.
2.
There is a $1 per trip cost savings on the existing 500,000, which provides a benefit of $500,000
per year. The gain in net benefits from the 100,000 new trips is 1/2($1)(100,000) = $50,000 per
year. The annual increase in benefits to motorists as a result of the new road will therefore be
$550,000.
3.
The opportunity cost of funds to finance the investments will be 16 percent, which is the equilibrium
gross return of airlines required to give a new return of 8 percent, which is the opportunity cost of
capital in the economy. Since the project will yield only 12 percent, there will be no increase in net
benefits because the opportunity cost of funds exceeds the return on the project.
4.
The net present value of the project at a 10-percent discount rate is –$1.98 million. The project
therefore does not merit approval. Because it has a negative net present value at a 10-percent dis-
count rate, it will also have a negative net present value at the higher interest rate of 15 percent.
5.
At 0 percent, PV = $10,000
At 1 percent, PV = $9,471.30
At 3 percent, PV = $8,530.20
At 5 percent, PV = $7,721,73
At 10 percent, PV = $6,144.57
If the current cost of the project is $8,000, it will have a positive benefit-cost ratio at interest rates
of 0 percent, 1 percent, and 3 percent.