EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008

American University of Beirut · Communication Systems · 5 pages

All EECE 442 files
EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008, page 1

Stuck on a question? A tutor can walk you through it.

EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008, page 2 EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008, page 3 EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008, page 4 EECE 442 Homework, Spring 2008, page 5

More EECE 442 files

Show the text of this homework
EECEA4A = -_ Hanewort #2 sin Problem 3.31} Let the sinusoidal signal m(‘) = AsinWot, where Wp = 27f9 The autocorrelation of ihe signal is R, (7) = © cos (apt) A R,,(0) = > nye Ry) = J OS! Wo * cra fr a“ T = cosi 9) Ae - 5 For this problem, we thus have R, = (ROL fm = (Rad {a} The optimum solution is given by Wo = RF il 2 u Q a & wN Gy . Tp-! (0) Jug = &,,(0)-1 RP mom 5 : 4A -> tl cos f) x © cos (pf y/(a°/2) We Is z 180 “5 Aa 2 = 51 -cos"(9f}) z ,_ Ss = 2-605 A7 0.345 A” Problem 3.32 R= x 1 08 06) 0.8 1 0.8 0.60.8 1 aT = [0.8, 0.6, 0.4] (a) Wo (b) J mn il -l = Rr xX 08 1 08} 106 10.608 1] [04 [0875] 0 0.125 P Ty-! R{0) ~r, R, vr. L if} r R(0) -1, Wo 1-0.7 +0.05 0.35 r “Ip 3 1 0.8 06 bs - f 1-[o8, 0.6, 0. io 2.975 -0. 0 12. 25 1-(0.8 x 0.875 ~ 04x 0.125) 181 Problem 3 3] K, = [3 a 10.8 I T r, = fos, 0.6] (a) Wy = Ri'r ul () Jin = R,(0)- 1 RY'r, 1-0.6444 = 0.3556 which is slightly worse than the result obtained with a linear predictor using three unit delays {i.e., three coefficients). This result is intuitively satisfying. Problem 3.34 Input signal variance = R,(0) The normalized autocorrelation of the input signal for a lag of one sample interval is cL Rx) 0.75 pi) = Rio) 7° ‘ Error variance = R,(0)—R,(1)R,'(0)R,(1) R(O)(L-92(1)) 182 R,(0) Processing gain. = ————~——___ R (0) - p,(1)) 1 1- p21) oe i~(0.75)* = 2.2857 Expressing the processing gain in dB, we have LOlog ,9(2.2857) = 3.59 dB Problem 3.35 R,(0 Processing gain = x(0) f Ty-}. coy 1— res fs nen’ RO) | (a) Three-tap predictor: Processing gain = 2.8571 = 4.56 dB (b) Two-tap predictor: Processing gain = 2.8715 = 4.49 dB Therefore, the use of a three-tap predictor in the DPCM system results an improvement of 4.56 - 4.49 = 0.07 dB over the corresponding system using a two-tap predictor. Problem 3.36 (a) For DPCM, we have 10logi9(SNR)g = & + 6n dB For PCM, we have 10logi9(SNR)o = 4.77 + 6n - 20log;g{log(1 + p)) where mis the number of quantization levels SNR of DPCM 183 4(5 SNR = @ + 6n, where -3 < a < 15 For n=8, the SNR is in the range of 45 to 63 dBs. SNR of PCM SNR = 4.77 + 6n - 20logjq(log(2.56)) = 4.77 + 48 - 14.8783 = 38 dB Therefore, the SNR improvement resulting from the use of DPCM is in the range of 7 to 25 dB. (b) Let us assume that 7, bits/sample are used for DPCM and x bits/sample for PCM If a = 15 dB, then we have 15 + 6n; = 6n - 10.0 10 + 15 6 Rearranging: (n-n,) = = 4.18 which. in effect, represents a saving of about 4 bits/sample due to the use of DPCM. Tf, on the other hand, we choose & = -3 dB, we have -3 + On, =6n- 10 10- a Rearranging: (n~1,) 2 6 L.Ol which represents a saving of about i bit/sample due to the use of DPCM. 184