ENG 227 Chapter 6 Main Points, Spring 2012
American University of Beirut · Introduction to Language · 2 pages · Dr. May Mikati
More ENG 227 files
- Chapter Grammatical Aspects of Language · Spring 2012ChapterView
- Chapter Main Points Chapter 1 · Spring 2012ChapterView
- Syllabus · Summer 2017LabView
- Midterm · Fall 2013ExamView
- Exam 1 · Fall 2011ExamView
- Notes Chap 9, 10, 11 · Fall 2011NotesView
- Syllabus · Fall 2011LabView
- Midterm · Fall 2011ExamView
Show the text of this chapter
Part III: The Biology and Psychology of Language/ Ch. 6: What Is
Language?
Language distinguishes humans from other animals; to some
Africans, a new born is a “thing”, not a “person” because the infant has
not yet learned language.
Language is much more than speech as illustrated by the sign
languages of the deaf.
The arbitrary relationship between form (e.g. sound) and
meaning is also true in sign languages.
Sound symbolism – onomatopoeic words – is found in most
languages, but the sounds differ from language to language (e.g.
cock-a-doodle doo vs kuku-kuku).
Memorizing dictionary words does not mean you know the
language: you must know the grammar. Knowledge of grammar
rules is generally unconscious.
Knowing a language implies creativity – being able to create
sentences you’ve never heard before (no dictionary can contain all
sentences of a language as the possibilities are infinite).
Linguistic knowledge/competence is different from linguistic
performance, which is affected by physiological and psychological
factors.
There is a difference between prescriptive and descriptive
grammars.
No language or dialect (variety of a language) is superior to another.
All are complex and rich; no language is “primitive”.
Language purists tend to oppose language change and deviation
from “standards”.
All languages and dialects are rule-governed.
Writing, unlike speaking – which is learnt unconsciously –must be
taught as it follows prescriptive rules that spoken language does not.
Additionally, it shows standardization rather than dialect variation.
Many linguists, including Chomsky, believe in a universal grammar
(UG) that is biologically ingrained. A major aim of linguistic theory is
to discover the nature of UG.
Sign language acquisition (including the equivalent of “babbling”) is
evidence for the innateness of language.
While animals communicate it is not clear that they have “languages”
that they use creatively like humans do. Bird songs and bee dances
show no creativity – only repetition.
No trained chimp has achieved the qualitative language ability of a
human child.
There are various theories on the origin of language: divine origin,
human invention, and evolutionary development.
The spoken languages of today have been around for tens of
thousands of years but the oldest deciphered written languages are
less than 6000 years old.
Most theories of language origin imply that all languages originated
from one source (the monogenetic theory of language origin).
Opposed to this is the idea that language arose in several locations,
and at different points in history.
The authors believe that language most probably evolved gradually
or in one big leap.
According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, “We dissect nature along
lines laid down by our native languages.” The strongest form of the
hypothesis is known as “linguistic determinism”; the weaker form is
“linguistic relativism”. For example, some languages don’t have
words for certain colors, and the Eskimo language Inuit has many
more words for snow than English.
Studies have shown that our thoughts are not affected by the words
or sentence structures of our language.
Grammatical gender enhances the human tendency to
“anthropomorphize” objects, supporting the weaker version of
linguistic relativism.
Advocates of politically correct language believe that changing the
way we talk can change the way we think (e.g. by eliminating racist
and sexist language). Still, Pinker points out that a “euphemism
treadmill” effect may be created (e.g. “crippled”/ “handicapped”/
“disabled”/ “challenged”).