PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012

American University of Beirut · Introductory Physics Laboratory II · 9 pages · with solution

All PHYS 210L files
PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 1

Stuck on a question? A tutor can walk you through it.

PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 2 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 3 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 4 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 5 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 6 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 7 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 8 PHYS 210L Lab Solved Report, Fall 2012, page 9

More PHYS 210L files

Show the text of this lab
PHYSICS 210L Thermal Expansion of Solids 1. Determination of the coefficient of linear expansion (a) Copper: L0 (mm) Rrm (k ) Trm (C) Rhot (k ) Thot (C) T (C) L (mm) 700 91.0 27 9.0 85 58 0.89 The expansion base shows the resistance at several temperatures. These stated temperatures are increasing by 1C, and showing the related resistance predictable. Therefore, the smallest division on this scale is 1C. Therefore, the error on the temperature is equal to ½ this division, and 0.5C We have to find the error on . We use then the Propagation of error to calculate it: With But the error is always ONE significant figure, therefore: The error on the Length variation is calculated by dividing the smallest division on the thermal expansion base's built-in dial gauge. 1 Therefore, knowing that the smallest division is (1/10) mm = 0.1mm, the error on the length variation is equal to 0.1 divided by 2: The error on the initial length is calculated through dividing the smallest division in measurement by two: Therefore, *Estimate the value of (for copper) and its rms error. Show your calculation of error propagation. 2 Therefore, *Compare the measured value of copper to the theoretically accepted value of copper = 17.610-6 /C. Taking , we compare it with the theoretical coefficient using %Difference calculation {accuracy comes later in the final part}. Therefore, the % difference is "24.4%", then, the result is not exact: The reason could be a lack in precision in measurements {especially in measuring the temperature}, or other external factors. {with reference to question 1 of this report, we find that this value is NOT accurate, and that leads to conclude that comparing these two values shows large difference between them.} (b) Steel: 3 L0 (mm) Rrm(k ) Trm (C) Rhot(k ) Thot (C) T (C) L (mm) 700 91.1 27 8.6 87 60 0.63 *Estimate the value of (for Steel) and its rms error. Show your calculation of error propagation. 4 Therefore, *Compare the experimentally measured value of steel to the theoretically accepted value, steel = 12.410-6 /C. Taking , we compare it with the theoretical coefficient using %Difference calculation {accuracy comes later in the final part}. Therefore, the % difference is "21%", then, the result is not exact, but more exact than the copper: The reason could also be a lack in precision in measurements, or other external factors. {with reference to question 1 of this report, we find that this value is NOT accurate, and that leads to conclude that comparing these two values shows large difference between them.} 5 (c) Aluminum: L0 (mm) Rrm(k ) Trm (C) Rhot(k ) Thot (C) T (C) L (mm) 700 90.4 27 12.4 76 49 1.19 *Estimate the value of (Aluminum) and its rms error. In the same way as previous, 6 *Compare your result to the theoretically accepted value of Aluminum, = 23.8610-6 /C. Taking , we compare it with the theoretical coefficient using %Difference calculation {accuracy comes later in the final part}. Therefore, the % difference is "45.4%", then, the result is not exact at all, it is the least exact value in the report: The reason could also be a lack in precision in measurements, or other external factors. {with reference to question 1 of this report, we find that this value is NOT accurate, and that leads to conclude that comparing these two values shows large difference between them.} ------------------------------------------------------- 2. Questions 1. Comment on the precision and accuracy of your measurements and speculate on the possible sources of error in your experiment. For the copper : Accuracy: The theoretical value does not belong to the interval of the experimental value the error = . Therefore, the experimental value is not accurate. Precision: To find the precision, we divide the error by the experimental value and we multiply it by 100. If the result is < 10%, the value is precise. Here, which means the value is precise. 7 For the steel : Accuracy: The theoretical value does not belong to the interval of the experimental value the error = . Therefore, the experimental value is not accurate. Precision: To find the precision, we divide the error by the experimental value and we multiply it by 100. If the result is < 10%, the value is precise. Here, which means the value is precise. For the aluminum : Accuracy: The theoretical value does not belong to the interval of the experimental value the error = . Therefore, the experimental value is not accurate. Precision: To find the precision, we divide the error by the experimental value and we multiply it by 100. If the result is < 10%, the value is precise. Here, which means the value is precise. The error sources could be: -Manufacture errors. -Lack of precision while measuring values. - and could be taken NOT exactly at the same moment, what causes the error in corresponding a Temperature to a certain change in length. -Lack of precision especially in temperature values, since the resistance taken appropriate to a certain temperature was not found exactly on the table, so the values were taken approximately. 2. From your result, calculate the coefficients of volume expansion for copper, steel and aluminum? The coefficient of volume expansion Therefore, we find these values and the error on them: For Copper: 8 with an error of in exact values. To calculate the error on it, we use propagation of error: Therefore, For Steel: In the same way, we multiply by 3 and we get: For Aluminum: Same procedure, we find: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9